The caeca (also spelled ceca) are a pair of blindsacs or lateral dilatations
of the gut, marking the beginning of the rectum. They are used as
an aid in the digestive system of some birds to help the enzymatic breakdown
of materials like cellulose. When the caeca are large the rectum
is shut off from the ileum or small intestine by a valvular sphincter,
which allows the faecal matter to ascend from the rectum into the caeca,
but prevents it from passing back into the ileum. The caeca vary extremely
in size in the different groups of Birds - they attain their greatest size
in those that are herbivorous, are small or hardly functional in most that
live on animal food, and are altogether absent in fruit eaters and grain
eaters. There are, however, so many exceptions to this broad generalisation,
that an enumeration is advisable, especially since a certain taxonomic
value cannot be denied to these organs.
It is highly probable that originally all Birds
possessed caeca, and that, according to the diet, these were either further
developed or reduced in size or even lost ultimately. Hence the mere presence
of caeca in a bird is of less taxonomic value than their state of development;
they are either functional, or without function; their absence is only
the last step of their degeneration.
1. The caeca are large and of great functional
importance in:
-
Struthio,
-
Rhea,
-
Apteryx,
-
Crypturi,
-
Gallinae,
-
Pteroclidae,
-
Grallae,
-
and Anseres.
The abovementioned birds are chiefly herbivorous.
Also the caeca are such in many worm-eating Limicolae, for instance in:
-
Avocet,
-
Lapwing,
-
Ringed Plover,
-
Oedicnemus,
-
Thinocorys,
-
Attagis,
-
and the Corncrake.
The caeca are also large and important in owls, and
in the following birds who are strictly insectivorous:
2. The caeca are distinctly functional, but
comparatively short, in:
-
Casuaris,
-
Dromaeus,
-
Grus,
-
Turnix,
-
many Anatidae (vegetable-eaters with a great predilection
for animal food),
-
Limicolae
-
Rallidae,
-
Numenius,
-
Totanus,
-
Gallinago,
-
Chionis,
-
Porphyrio,
-
Porzana;
-
The piscivorous Spheniscidae,
-
Pelicanus,
-
Podicipes,
-
Uria,
-
Colymbus;
-
Merops,
-
and Phoenicopterus.
3. The caeca are quite degenerated and functionless,
being either:
(a) reduced to small wartlike or vermiform
appendages, as in some of the:
-
Spheniscidae,
-
Herodii,
-
Pelargi,
-
Steganopodes,
-
Laridae,
-
Strepsilas,
-
Limosa,
-
Scolopax,
-
Parra,
-
Rhinochetus,
-
many Columbae,
-
Accipitres,
-
and Passeres;
Or
(b) they are entirely absent, as in many
of the:
-
Columbae,
-
Psittaci,
-
Musophaga,
-
Corythaix,
-
Pici,
-
Alcedinidae,
-
Bucerotidae,
-
Upupidae,
-
Colius,
-
Cypselidae,
-
and Trochilidae.
4. Sometimes one caecum remains in a rudimentary
condition and the other one has disappeared. This is the rule in almost
all Herodii and in Procellaria, but occasionally met with in Steganopodes,
Podicipes, Strepsilas, and in Atrichia.
The greatest development of the caeca occurs
in Struthio, Rhea, Tinamus, and Meleagris, their aggregate volume equalling
or even surpassing that of the rest of the intestinal canal, the caeca
in these cases, especially in Ratitae, showing numerous transverse constrictions
and sacculations, which increase the absorbing surface. A certain correlation exists between the caeca
and the length and width of the rectum.
The examples above seem to show that caeca are
not required for the digestion of meat, fruit, and grain. Fish-eating Ducks
have considerably shorter caeca than their strictly vegetarian relations.
The same remark applies to those Waders which live upon molluscs and other
soft-bodied invertebrates.
The presence or absence of the caeca being thus
explained by the food, a clue will occasionally be afforded to the systematic
position of birds in which they appear against reasonable expectation.
It is clear that a change of diet may be accomplished in a much shorter
time than it takes to modify the various digestive organs. For instance,
the exclusive meat-diet of the Birds-of-Prey has reduced their caeca to
mere rudiments, and it is more than improbable that the insectivorous habits
of many of the smaller Falconidae will ever redevelop these organs, especially
since these birds throw out the indigestible parts in pellets. Owls now
cannot be distinguished from Diurnal Birds-of-Prey by their diet - they
possess large caeca, and cannot therefore be derived from the Accipitres,
which have lost them, nor is it probable that Owls and Accipitres came
from one common stock and are collateral branched, because in this case
both would be of equal age, and we should have to assume that the meat-diet
had in one branch suppressed and in the other branch preserved or even
increased the caeca. We can only conclude that the Owls are descendants
of a stock of birds which, like the Nightjars, lived on chitinous insects
(Beetles, Moths), and that they, like Podargus, as shown by its predilection
for mice, comparatively recently took to the flesh of vertebrates.
As may be expected, the members of any large and
much diversified group of birds, like Waders, Pigeons, Spheniscidae, and,
others, have caeca in various stages of development.
|